August 22, 2026 | Read online
Your Best Salespeople Shouldn't Be Working For Your CRM
by Kevin 'KD' Dorsey
Five hours.
That's roughly how much time a week a good rep can spend doing something that has absolutely nothing to do with selling:
Entering data into the CRM.
Five hours doesn't sound like much until you multiply it.
Five hours a week is 260 hours a year.
That's more than six full workweeks.
And if you've got a rep who's fully loaded at $500K a year, you're effectively paying about $240 an hour for that person's time.
So you're spending more than $60,000 a year for your top salesperson to type things into fields.
I don't know about y'all, but that's not exactly what I thought we were hiring them for.
The Cost Isn't Really The Data Entry
The obvious cost is the labor.
The bigger cost is what doesn't happen while the rep is doing it.
They aren't researching the next account.
They aren't talking to an economic buyer.
They aren't following up with the prospect who went quiet.
They aren't preparing for tomorrow's meeting.
They aren't coaching a junior rep.
They're copying information from one system into another because our sales technology somehow decided that the human who created the information should also be responsible for manually documenting every piece of it.
That's backwards.
And it's one of those things sales leaders have gotten so used to that we barely question it anymore.
We tell reps:
"Make sure your CRM is up to date."
"Log the call."
"Update the opportunity."
"Complete the fields."
"Put your notes in."
Then we wonder why our sellers aren't spending enough time selling.
The CRM Was Supposed To Work For The Rep
This is where I think we've gotten the whole thing backwards.
The original promise of CRM was pretty simple:
Capture what happens so the organization can learn from it.
But somewhere along the way, the CRM became a second job.
The rep has the customer conversation.
Then the rep has to recreate the customer conversation inside the CRM.
The rep sends the email.
Then the rep has to document the email.
The rep learns something important about the account.
Then the rep has to find the right field to put it in.
We're asking the seller to be the salesperson, the researcher, the analyst, and the data-entry clerk.
And then we're surprised when CRM hygiene becomes a leadership problem.
Maybe it's not a rep problem.
Maybe it's a systems problem.
Good Data Should Be A Byproduct Of Selling
This is the shift I'm interested in with AI.
We shouldn't be asking:
"How do we get reps to enter better data?"
We should be asking:
"How do we capture the data that's already being created?"
Because the information is already there.
It's in the sales call.
It's in the email thread.
It's in the account research.
It's in the conversations happening every day between buyers and sellers.
The question is whether your systems are smart enough to capture it.
That's why the work Microsoft is doing inside Dynamics 365 caught my attention.
Their Data Enrichment Agent can listen to sales calls, read emails, and pull from third-party data sources to automatically update CRM records.
The important part isn't simply that it saves a rep from typing.
It's what happens downstream.
Data Is The Foundation
Here's where I think this gets much more interesting than simple automation.
Clean data isn't just useful for reporting.
It's fuel.
If your CRM has accurate, current information, everything built on top of it gets better.
Account research gets better.
Next-best actions get better.
Deal risk detection gets better.
AI agents get better.
Forecasting gets better.
Coaching gets better.
That's because every system downstream is only as good as the information feeding it.
Garbage in, garbage out.
We've all heard that before.
But AI makes it even more important because we're starting to build systems that can actually act on the information inside the CRM.
If the data is incomplete because reps didn't have time to enter it, you're not building an intelligent sales organization.
You're building an automated organization with bad information.
That's a very different thing.
This Is What A Revenue Machine Actually Looks Like
I've spent a lot of time talking about the difference between building a sales team and building a sales system.
This is a perfect example.
A sales team depends on people remembering to do things.
A sales system makes the right things happen automatically.
The rep has the conversation.
The system captures the information.
The CRM gets updated.
The data improves the next action.
The next action creates another conversation.
The system learns again.
That's a flywheel.
And the rep stays focused on the part humans are actually good at:
Building relationships.
Understanding problems.
Creating urgency.
Navigating complexity.
Asking the hard question.
Closing the deal.
Don't Automate The Wrong Thing
There's an important distinction here.
I'm not interested in AI because it can automate stuff.
We can automate a lot of useless stuff.
I'm interested in AI when it removes friction between a salesperson and the work that actually creates revenue.
That's the test I use.
If you automate something and the rep gets more time to think, sell, coach, or build relationships...
Good.
If you automate something and now you just have a more efficient way to generate more administrative work...
Congratulations.
You built a faster treadmill.
The goal isn't more automation.
It's better allocation of human attention.
Ask Yourself This
Take your top five reps.
Look at their calendars from last week.
Now estimate how many hours they spent doing work that only existed because your systems couldn't capture information automatically.
CRM updates.
Manual research.
Copying notes.
Building reports.
Updating fields.
Chasing information.
Then multiply that by your entire sales organization.
That's your administrative tax.
And most sales leaders have never actually calculated it.
They just accept it as the cost of doing business.
I don't think we should anymore.
Your best salesperson is too expensive to be a data-entry clerk.
And your CRM is too important to depend on somebody remembering to update it every Friday afternoon.
The future of sales isn't a rep entering more data.
It's a system that understands what's happening and gets smarter from it.
That's the direction Microsoft is taking with Dynamics 365 and its Data Enrichment Agent, and it's the kind of sales technology I'm paying attention to.
Because when the system does the documentation...
The seller can do the selling.
And I'd much rather pay a $500K rep to close a $500K deal than to spend five hours a week typing into a dropdown menu.
Your CRM should work for your salespeople.
Not the other way around.
| How did you like this newsletter? |
|
|
|
|
|
